IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> war flying, (finding Wi-Fi access from planes)

Deepone
post Jun 11 2004, 01:33 PM
Post #1
Ball Eat Champion! Dwarf on a Wharf Champion! Q Bert 2004 Champion! Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Brawl Champion! Western Shooter Champion!

The One Deep Down
*****

Group: Private Member
Posts: 1137
Joined: 12-May 04
From: Masala / Kirkkonummi / Finland
Member No.: 101



QUOTE
How many wireless access points are out there? How many have security features turned on? On April 27, 2004 Humphrey Cheung, an editor for THG, along with three other hackers took to the skies to find out. Flying in two small airplanes and using cheap off-the-shelf components, they found 4500+ wireless access points (WAPS). Surprisingly, only 30% of the access points had encryption turned on. In addition, a successful video conferencing session was done between the planes. In fact, this may have been the first successful video chat between two small planes using everyday hardware. 


QUOTE
Team Tomshardware found 1433 access points with 380 encrypted and 1053 unencrypted. Team Dailywireless found 3151 access points with 1026 encrypted and 2125 unencrypted. Dailywireless found more WAPs because of higher powered antennas and the Kismet program. Kismet is able to detect WAPs that NetStumbler misses, like WAPs with cloaked SSIDs. Some WAPs have a "Cloak SSID" feature that allows them to operate without blasting out the SSID to the world.


full story here: 'http://www4.tomshardware.com/column/20040430/index.html

This post has been edited by Deepone: Jun 11 2004, 01:34 PM


--------------------
This person is best talked to with the help of a computer..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Taggard
post Jun 15 2004, 10:17 AM
Post #2


nFm [ stuck around ]
**

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 14-June 04
Member No.: 117



It's nice to know about utilities for sniffing out cloaked SSIDs. This utility seems useful if one were to need to do a wireless install in an area and wanted to make sure there was no interference within certain channels. You can always use frequency sniffing equiptment, but this utility makes for a better utility than netstumbler that uses over-the-counter wireless equiptment to see what networks are in the area.

Thanks for the tip. This will certainly help save me some time and resources at some point soon.


--------------------
THINK or slow down evolution...You choose, but use your brain to make that choice.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st July 2025 - 09:29 PM