IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

[ Outline ] · Standard · Linear+

> AMD annihilates Intel in dual core benchmark tests, the inquirer & cnet's articles

Deepone
post Nov 28 2005, 01:46 PM
Post #1


The One Deep Down
*****

Group: Private Member
Posts: 1137
Joined: 12-May 04
From: Masala / Kirkkonummi / Finland
Member No.: 101



QUOTE
After reading the round-by-round account of our dual-core desktop CPU prizefight, it should come as no shock that AMD's Athlon 64 X2 chips are the runaway victors here, laying out the Intel Pentium D and Pentium Extreme Edition 840 chips pins up. If we had to call out one chip, AMD's Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is an outstanding bargain given the competition, but as our results show, any AMD dual-core CPU will serve you better than its similarly priced Intel equivalent.
QUOTE
Whatever Intel's strategy, it doesn't seem to have held up. We're very interested to see what happens when the next generation of chips and chipsets hits the market starting in January. But until then, AMD's Athlon 64 X2 should be your dual-core processor of choice.
QUOTE
A SO-CALLED "prizefight" set of benchmarks run by news.com has pitted a heavyweight champion against a dead lightweight failure, if the results are to be believed.

News.com pitted AMD versus Intel dual core CPUs and tested areas including day to day computing, gaming, multitasking, photo editing, MP3 encoding, video encoding and bangs per buck, or price performance as others call it.
QUOTE
According to this, out of a total points of 100, AMD got 100 and Intel got zero.


now does it surprise anyone that Intel had turned down the fight gauntlet for dual-core server prosessors?


--------------------
This person is best talked to with the help of a computer..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st July 2025 - 03:19 PM