Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+ USA's governoument gone out of its mind, Piracy more offensive than assault ? :S

[Deepone]

Details of the upgraded act, which has the blessing of the music and film industry and the Bush administration, are now coming to light. It appears that the DMCA will have a maximum sentence of ten years inside for the crime of software and music piracy. It will also give the FBI the powers to wiretap suspected pirates.

If you copy Craig David's CD you get ten years, but if you punch him in the face and pummel him into a seven day coma you will only get six. You are more likely to get the respect of the prison population with your six year sentence as well.

source: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31256

"It's one degree more likely that mere communication about the means of accomplishing a hack would be subject to penalties," said Peter Jaszi, who teaches copyright law at American University and is critical of attempts to expand it.

Jessica Litman, who teaches copyright law at Wayne State University, views the DMCA expansion as more than just a minor change. "If Sony had decided to stand on its rights and either McAfee or Norton Antivirus had tried to remove the rootkit from my hard drive, we'd all be violating this expanded definition," Litman said.

Jessica Litman, who teaches copyright law at Wayne State University, views the DMCA expansion as more than just a minor change. "If Sony had decided to stand on its rights and either McAfee or Norton Antivirus had tried to remove the rootkit from my hard drive, we'd all be violating this expanded definition," Litman said.

The proposed law scheduled to be introduced by Rep. Smith also does the following:

• Permits wiretaps in investigations of copyright crimes, trade secret theft and economic espionage. It would establish a new copyright unit inside the FBI and budgets $20 million on topics including creating "advanced tools of forensic science to investigate" copyright crimes.

• Amends existing law to permit criminal enforcement of copyright violations even if the work was not registered with the U.S. Copyright Office.

• Boosts criminal penalties for copyright infringement originally created by the No Electronic Theft Act of 1997 from five years to 10 years (and 10 years to 20 years for subsequent offenses). The NET Act targets noncommercial piracy including posting copyrighted photos, videos or news articles on a Web site if the value exceeds $1,000.

• Creates civil asset forfeiture penalties for anything used in copyright piracy. Computers or other equipment seized must be "destroyed" or otherwise disposed of, for instance at a government auction. Criminal asset forfeiture will be done following the rules established by federal drug laws.

• Says copyright holders can impound "records documenting the manufacture, sale or receipt of items involved in" infringements.

more of the topic: http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6064016.html

This post has been edited by Deepone: Apr 26 2006, 04:52 PM

[Bearsland]

Bit of an unfair topic title there, dude.

It should be noted here that this is the USA government and lawmakers who are making these rules, NOT the American people; the majority of whom, I am sure, will be just as disgusted as you are, Deepone.

This is not just an American thing, it's a worldwide phenomenon. Most countries of the world have governments which are very out of touch with their citizens; the recent change in employment laws (now cancelled) in France is a perfect example.

[Deepone]

oh well, point taken. thought talkin about country would mean its gov if talkin about the laws ie didnt especially mean the US cizisens but the governoument.. fixed it to state that as well :)
recently here in Finland we had this election for the poorest finn.. guess who won it ? Tanja Karpela, who was the main person behind the new copyright act.. ;)
on other news i'm starting to get out of drugs.. (the heavy pain killers I've had to use for the hip, they unfortunately cause addiction) =P lets say it as a reason why i didnt think it so clearly :P

[Bearsland]

oh well, point taken. thought talkin about country would mean its gov if talkin about the laws ie didnt especially mean the US cizisens but the governoument.. fixed it to state that as well :)
recently here in Finland we had this election for the poorest finn.. guess who won it ? Tanja Karpela, who was the main person behind the new copyright act.. ;)
on other news i'm starting to get out of drugs.. (the heavy pain killers I've had to use for the hip, they unfortunately cause addiction) =P lets say it as a reason why i didnt think it so clearly :P

I wasn't flaming you, my friend; merely pointing out the difference between a people and their government; whilst also trying to remind you of the dangers of 'tarring everyone with the same brush'.

[Deepone]

hehee.. dont worry, didn't take it badly at all :) just wanted to explain the choice a bit while fixin the problem out of sight :) and also offering a convenient excuse for both of us :P

This post has been edited by Deepone: Apr 27 2006, 07:23 AM